Illustrative scenario

Run Quarterly ASC 820 Level 3 Valuations Without Rebuilding the Workflow Every Time

For a Chief Investment Officer at a private credit fund, quarterly ASC 820 Level 3 fair value measurement is a high-stakes, high-cost routine: outside valuation advisors re-engage each quarter, update borrower financial models, pull market-yield benchmarks, and produce the significant-unobservable-inputs disclosures your audit committee needs. At $100k–$500k per year, you're paying advisory rates for a process that is largely defined by the prior quarter's work.

Up and running in ~10 wkFor: Chief Investment Officer, private credit fund
Estimate your payback
~4 mo
Payback period
$300K
Est. savings / year
+$200K
Year-1 net

Rough estimate — change the numbers to match your business. We scope the real figures with you on a call.

Why Level 3 Valuation Work Costs What It Does

Mark-to-model valuation for private loans requires updating each borrower's financial model with the latest covenant compliance certificate data, sourcing applicable market-yield benchmarks (typically from Refinitiv LPC for private credit), and documenting significant unobservable inputs for ASC 820 disclosure. The methodology is established — what varies quarter to quarter is the input data. Outside valuation advisors charge engagement rates to run this update cycle, which means you're paying for methodology re-application rather than new analytical judgment. For a fund with a large private loan portfolio, that cost compounds quickly.

How an AI Agent Runs the Mark-to-Model Cycle

An AI Labor Company agent mines your prior ASC 820 Level 3 valuation model review emails and independent-valuation-firm engagement letters to reconstruct the quarterly mark-to-model workflow for private loans. A managed agent then updates each borrower's financial model using the latest covenant compliance certificates, applies current market-yield benchmarks from Refinitiv LPC, and assembles the fair-value determination and significant-unobservable-inputs disclosure for CIO review. The package routes to you before audit committee approval and quarterly financial statement finalization. Nothing is finalized without your sign-off. Typically live in 10 weeks.

What This Returns to the Fund

The direct value is cost reduction: illustratively, 50–70% of the hours currently going to outside valuation advisors shift to the agent. For a fund spending $100k–$500k per year on this work, the savings are meaningful at the fund-expense level — which ultimately flows to net returns. There's also a consistency benefit that matters for audit: when the same methodology is applied quarter after quarter with full documentation, auditor review of the Level 3 disclosure becomes more predictable. Over time, that reduces the back-and-forth that typically extends the audit timeline.

Questions

How does the agent source Refinitiv LPC yield benchmarks?

The agent is configured to pull market-yield data from Refinitiv LPC through your existing data subscription. If your fund uses a different benchmark source, the integration is configured accordingly during onboarding.

Does the agent handle the full ASC 820 disclosure, or just the model update?

The agent produces both the fair-value determination and the significant-unobservable-inputs disclosure draft. The CIO reviews both before they go to the audit committee. The agent does not finalize disclosures autonomously.

What happens if a borrower's financial position changes materially mid-quarter?

Material changes flagged in covenant compliance certificates are surfaced as exceptions for CIO review rather than processed through the standard model-update workflow. The agent is designed to route anomalies to human judgment, not paper over them.

Related use cases

Illustrative scenario for finance, accounting & tax. Figures are example ranges, not guarantees — we scope real numbers with you on a call.

Want this running in your business?

We'll scope an agent for this on a free 15-minute call.

Book a free call